Which nearshore providers AI assistants name
Buyers now ask an assistant before they open a search engine. This page measures what those assistants answer — which providers they name, and which they never mention — using a fixed set of questions published here in full.
It is a measurement of the assistants, not a ranking of the companies. A provider absent from every answer has not been judged by this directory; it has been found to be invisible to a particular set of machines on a particular day.
- Questions
- 48
- Assistants
- 6
- Answers read
- 576
- Named at least once
- 53/89
How this is measured
The assistants
Each question is put to every assistant twice, and both answers are kept. Asking once would record a coin toss: these systems do not return the same answer to the same question.
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Google AI Mode
2 runs per assistant
Why Claude is not here
Claude is excluded at the request of the directory’s operator and is not measured. Saying so matters: an absent assistant is a gap in what this page covers, not a finding about it.
The tool
The questions were put to the assistants with CreceRank, which records every answer and the pages each one cited. The cross-reference against the eighty-nine companies here was done by hand: a name in an answer is a question, not an answer, and the ones that were read and thrown out are listed further down.
crecerank.comRecommendation intent only
Nothing informational. “What is nearshore outsourcing?” tells us nothing about whether an assistant names a provider, so no question like it is here. Every one asks the assistant to name, rank or compare companies.
The questions, in full
48 questions across 5 groups
All of them, exactly as sent. A page that reports AI visibility without publishing what it asked is reporting a number nobody can check — and the wording decides the answer, so the wording is the method.
Built with the GEO-INTENT framework: geographic relevance, expertise alignment, opportunity value, intent strength, natural-language variation and tracking consistency.
By country
Geographic relevance18One pair per country the directory covers, identical in wording so the nine are comparable. A buyer with a country already in mind asks this question first.
Which software development companies in Argentina are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Argentina.
Which software development companies in Brazil are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Brazil.
Which software development companies in Chile are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Chile.
Which software development companies in Colombia are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Colombia.
Which software development companies in Costa Rica are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Costa Rica.
Which software development companies in El Salvador are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in El Salvador.
Which software development companies in Mexico are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Mexico.
Which software development companies in Peru are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Peru.
Which software development companies in Uruguay are best for US clients?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Uruguay.
Across the region
Geographic relevance · Natural-language variation8The same market asked eight different ways. A provider that appears in ranked lists and vanishes from narrow recommendations has a different kind of authority than one that survives both, and only asking both ways shows it.
Who are the best nearshore software development companies in Latin America?
Please give me a list of the best 10 nearshore software development companies in Latin America.
What are the top-rated Latin American software development agencies according to client reviews?
Which nearshore software companies in Latin America are most trusted by US companies?
Which Latin American software development partners work in US time zones?
Which country in Latin America is best for nearshore software development, and which companies lead there?
Which nearshore software companies in Latin America are best for a long-term engineering partnership?
Who should I contact to build a software team in Latin America?
By engagement model
Expertise alignment10The five models the directory has measured most providers publishing. Each is a different commercial question: staff augmentation and build-operate-transfer are not bought by the same person.
Which companies are best for nearshore staff augmentation in Latin America?
Please give me a list of the best 10 staff augmentation companies in Latin America.
Which Latin American companies provide dedicated development teams for US clients?
Who are the best nearshore partners for building a software product from scratch?
Which Latin American software companies are best for legacy system modernization?
Which nearshore companies in Latin America are best for cloud migration projects?
Who are the best nearshore data and AI engineering companies in Latin America?
Which Latin American companies are best for nearshore QA and software testing?
Which nearshore companies offer managed software development services in Latin America?
Which Latin American providers offer build-operate-transfer for engineering teams?
By role
Expertise alignment6The six roles the most measured providers name on their own pages. Phrased as hiring questions because that is how the demand arrives.
Which companies are best for hiring nearshore React developers in Latin America?
Which nearshore companies in Latin America have the strongest Python engineering teams?
Who are the best nearshore AI and machine learning engineering companies in Latin America?
Which Latin American companies are best for hiring nearshore DevOps engineers?
Which nearshore companies in Latin America are best for mobile app development?
Which Latin American software companies have the best UI and UX design teams?
By what is at stake
Opportunity value6Not every engagement is worth the same. These ask for the ones where the choice of provider carries real consequence — regulated industries, money, a product that has to scale — which is where a buyer most wants somebody else's judgement.
Which nearshore software companies in Latin America have the most experience with fintech products?
Which Latin American software companies are best for healthcare software and HIPAA-regulated products?
Which nearshore companies in Latin America are best for taking a startup MVP to production?
Which Latin American software companies can support a product that needs to scale to millions of users?
Which nearshore providers in Latin America are best for enterprise software modernization?
Which Latin American software companies are most experienced with regulated industries?
What the assistants answered
Ranked by share of answers
The measurement gives a share of voice only to the providers named often enough to rank. Nine of them are in this directory; the tenth, Revelo, is not.
| Share | Avg. position | Domain rating | Questions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BairesDev | 49.7% | 2.1 | 79 | 44 |
| Globant | 32.5% | 2.3 | 78 | 41 |
| Softtek | 21.2% | 3.2 | 68 | 31 |
| Gorilla Logic | 18.4% | 3.6 | 52 | 29 |
| Encora | 10.6% | 4 | 69 | 30 |
| Tecla | 10.6% | 4.9 | 69 | 36 |
| Cheesecake Labs | 8.9% | 4.2 | 53 | 23 |
| BEON.tech | 8.5% | 4 | 44 | 26 |
| AgileEngine | 8% | 4.2 | 50 | 31 |
The assistants recommend companies that no longer exist
Encora scores 10.6% and encora.com serves Coforge’s homepage, with twelve mentions of Coforge and none of Encora. Tryolabs is named four times and its domain is Qubika’s. Nearsure is named five times and is part of Nortal. All three were read on the companies’ own sites before this scan ran — which is why a directory that measures can say it, and a list that copies the assistants cannot.
Named, not ranked
44 more directory companies appeared in answers without being named often enough to score. The count is how many of the 48 questions produced a mention.
- Distillery23
- Rootstack21
- Improving19
- Endava18
- Unosquare18
- Wizeline18
- Flux IT17
- Qubika13
- CI&T12
- Rootstrap12
- Svitla Systems12
- Huenei11
- Teravision Technologies10
- Perficient Latin America9
- Devlane8
- Baufest6
- GeneXus6
- Nearsure6
- Tryolabs6
- 10Pines5
- ImageMaker5
- Stefanini5
- Ceiba Software4
- LoopStudio4
- Interfell3
- Jalasoft3
- Jobsity3
- Kaizen Softworks3
- Nexton3
- Scio Consulting3
- Tekton Labs3
- Applaudo Studios2
- ArcTouch2
- Elaniin2
- Koombea2
- Making Sense2
- Snoop Consulting2
- Capicua1
- Icalia Labs1
- NaN Labs1
- Objective1
- Practia1
- Praxent1
- Pyxis1
Named in none of them
36 of the 89 companies in this directory appeared in no answer to any of the 48 questions. That is a finding about them, not a gap in the measurement.
By country
No published country12
Argentina4
Colombia4
United States4
Uruguay4
Mexico3
Chile2
Brazil1
Canada1
Peru1
What was thrown out
Two matches were read and rejected. PSL appears once, inside the URL slug of a press release about Perficient acquiring it — a cited page is not a recommendation, and three letters match things they should not. Moove It appears once, inside an explanation of where Qubika came from; mentioned as somebody else’s past is not being put forward as a provider.
These questions do not change
They are not rewritten because a scan produced an unflattering answer. They change only when the directory adds a country, a service becomes important, or a question turns out to be ambiguous — and a change is recorded, because a measurement compared against a different question is not a comparison.
How this page is built
Named sources
Every figure carries the source it was read from and the date it was read. Nothing is estimated.
Published methodology
The scale, the gates and the thresholds are generated by the scoring engine itself, so what you read is what ran.
Declared gaps
What we have not measured says so. It is never rendered as a zero or filled with a guess.
No paid placement
No provider can buy a listing, a position or a reconsideration. There is no advertising on this site.